This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Community Corner

Sales Tax Ordinance No 13- 34 WHEREAS Part 1

Actually you are not directly voting on the GreenLight Plan. You are voting to make Ordinance 13 -34 a law. This is an important distinction, because Ordinance 13- 34 will become a law if the referendum succeeds, but the GreenLight Plan does not.

 

This Post continues a series where we look at The Sales Tax Ordinance, Ordinance 13- 34, and compare it to what is being said by the sales tax supporters.

Find out what's happening in Clearwaterwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

 

Here is a link to the actual Ordinance (Law) that you are being asked to approve in the sales Tax Referendum: Greenlight Pinellas Tax Ordinance.

Find out what's happening in Clearwaterwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

 

Here we look at the Whereas Section

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and the Acts, the Board is authorized and intends to enter into an interlocal agreement with the PST A remitting the Surtax proceeds to the PSTA for the improvement, construction, operation, maintenance and financing of public transit benefitting Pinellas County, including an expanded bus system with bus rapid transit, increased frequency and extended hours, and local passenger rail and regional connections (the "Interlocal Agreement"); and

 

You will note the NOWHERE in this Ordinance are these interlocal agreements defined. They are to be defined AFTER the Sales Tax referendum passes.

 

In other words the County is asking you to Tax yourselves $130 million dollars a year, and telling you they will set up a series of agreements with PSTA, possibly TBARTA and who knows who else to spend these tax dollars after you pass the taxing Ordinance.

 

 At that point with the sales tax Ordinance now law, the public has no say into how this money will distributed or spent and no guarantee that the GreenLight plan will be part of these interlocal agreements.

 

WHEREAS, the use of Surtax revenues for the repayment of bonds and other obligations or indebtedness incurred to provide public transit is appropriate and permissible in accordance with the Acts; and

 

This Whereas and Section it supports is the pivotal part of this Ordinance.

 

The supporting sections in the actual Ordinance set up the whole purpose for this Ordinance which is to as quickly as possible get a bond issue up to the County Commission which will obligate a large portion or more likely all of the sales tax revenue to a bond issue or a series of bond issues which will be specific in purpose (build a train).

 

At that point, should the bond issue be approved by the County Commission, which it likely would be, this sales tax or whatever portion of it is pledged to the bonds, becomes a permanent fixture for the life of the bonds and cannot be used for any other purpose.

 

It is also important to point out that once pledged as bond revenue the sales tax or the portion pledged cannot be cancelled or rescinded until the bind obligation is satisfied. In other words 20 year bond equals 20 years of the tax.

 

e-mail Doc at: dr.webb@verizon.net, or send me a Facebook (Gene Webb)Friend request. See More of Doc at Bay Post Internet, WATCHDOGWIRE-FLORIDA and St.Pete Patch, Gulfport Patch, Clearwater Patch, Palm Harbor Patch, Largo Patch.
Disclosures: Contributor to No Tax for Tracks

 

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?