Opposition to Hampton Inn Plans Could Bring Changes to Beach-by-Design
City leaders' opposition to a 150-foot tall Hampton Inn could bring changes to guidelines developers follow when creating projects for Clearwater Beach.
Photos
Some city leaders would like to see less creativity when it comes to developing South Clearwater Beach.
And because of their opposition to a Hampton Inn, the guidelines developers follow when creating projects for Clearwater Beach may be changed.
City council members opposed plans for a 150-foot-tall Hampton Inn for South Clearwater Beach in a 2-3 vote. They also opposed a plan 2-3 to redevelop the Quality Inn, which also would have meant using hotel rooms from a special density pool developed as part of Beach by Design.
Council members Doreen Hock-Dipolito and Jay Polglaze voted for the plans.
“This is more than a philosophical point. This is more like creative code interpretation and it sets a precedent,” said Mayor George N. Cretekos, who opposed the plans.
The project included demolishing the Quality Inn parking lot to develop a 15-story Key West Coastal design hotel as a Hampton Inn. The existing 91-room Quality Inn would have undergone changes as well.
The two developments would be connected with a 247-space parking garage that would take up the first five floors of the Hampton Inn.
Some leaders were uncomfortable with the deal that also would have taken 60 units from the density pool so the Quality Inn would meet code. Because of the lot adjustment and changes in code, the allowable amount of rooms at the Quality Inn would be 31.
There are 947 total rooms available in the density pool, which was established with 1,385 rooms in 2008 as part of the Beach-by-Design charter. The rooms are an incentive to create more dense development on certain parts of Clearwater Beach. The process includes reviews by city staff and volunteer groups like the Community Development Board before going to the City Council for its vote.
Polglaze worried about going against the established guidelines in Beach by Design.
“We created a path for allocation of these density units, and we go ahead and allow a developer to spend, and then we decide that maybe the path is not correct,” he said. “I think the path that has been created is correct. There will be 870 units left and they are first-come, first-served. ... There’s a lot of empty lots. When we use them up, we’re done.”
Sign up for the free Clearwater Patch email newsletter to stay connected to your community.
Beach residents came out and voiced their opposition to the plans.
Janet Mass, president of Continental Towers, a condominium adjacent to Quality Inn, said she was there representing 84 owners.
“It’s not so much Beach by Design as much as it is Beach by Developer,” Mass said.
Steve Page, the project developer, said he spent about $170,000 on architect and design fees as well as securing the hotel’s flag, Hampton Inn.
“It’s very difficult to navigate through situations through this,” Page said, adding in that he followed the rules set in the Beach by Design code. “That’s all I have to go by.”
After the meeting, Page was not sure what his next step is.
“Nothing can happen now,” he said. “A Hampton Inn would be a great prize for the beach.”
With the vote, Page is out the money he spent to get to this point.
“I don’t feel good we ended up where we ended up,” said Vice Mayor Paul Gibson, who voted against the plans. “It is exactly the way the Business Task Force was saying there has to be a way to get something in front of us before (developers) spend all that money.”
At the end of the council meeting, Bill Horne, city manager, said work will start on revising the Beach by Design guidelines.
“It is obvious we need to review Beach by Design because staff clearly needs some moderation on its relativity,” Horne said. “We will come back with a timeline to make changes to Beach by Design.”
City Attorney Pam Akin said the process will take some time.
“Beach by Design took many hours, it was a very involved process and I think reviewing that process is going to take a lot of commitment,” she said. “This is probably not a one meeting discussion probably a multiple session discussion because it is pretty far reaching.”
Related coverage:
Randy Watson
11:36 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013
This is exactly why it is so hard t have a business on Clearwater Beach. The City makes it impossible to get approved and change the rules all along the way. They say oh we aren't enforcing that right now and as soon as you do it they fine you and threaten to pull your license. No Signs except for resturants and boutiques. They are exactly the ones who don't need signs as their building are painted with their trademark identifiers.. Small businesses can only use 30% of a window which turns out to be so small you can't see it! This council is not looking out for Clearwater Beach, rather them on selves who live there. Start working on the Pier 60 2 weeks before Spring Break? Closing Mandalay 11 months staring now before Spring Break? Are they trying to put us all out of business? Who approves the timing for projects that so drastically effects the seasonal business we might have ? This is just not right. Like the people who put up all money to plan to build Hampton for nothing but to get shot down by the same old council members that live on the beach.
InsiderMyself
3:20 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013
This is not about creativity. This is about "SIZE". The voters decided, and we have codes regarding what kind of beach we want. No one wants to follow the rules, and parting up parcels to qualify, was a nice try. Now, the developers are angry. That's too bad. It's about time the developers came here after reading and accepting our building codes. Just look at Sand Key! A two foot surge, overtook the sewar system and sand key polluted beaches down to Treasure Island! Enough! All this over a few rooms? Then leave.....I am happy about this vote!