patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Clear Channel Responds to Censored Billboard

A controversial billboard was censored because the advertiser did not get rights to use images of the actors portrayed in the political satire, not because it supports gay marriage, officials at Clear Channel say.

CLEARWATER, FL -- A controversial billboard was censored because the advertiser did not get rights to use images of the actors portrayed in the political satire, not because it supports gay marriage, officials at Clear Channel said.

Dating website beautifulpeople.com bought a billboard near State Road 580 and Belcher Road and wanted to include an image of actors depicting presidential candidate Mitt Romney betrothed to real estate mogul Donald Trump with President Barack Obama officiating.

They were shocked to find out that it wasn’t the City of Clearwater that banned the image, but the billboard’s seller, Clear Channel.

“It’s a simple legality issue,” said Jim Cullinan, vice president of Clear Channel marketing and communications. “It has nothing to do with anything else ... I wish it was more complicated.”

The censored billboard has white-space cutouts in place of the images of the actors portraying the politicians and businessman. A press release from beautifulpeople.com claimed the action was politcally motived.

Tampa is the host city of the Republican National Convention Aug. 27-30. The billboard is up through August.

“It’s one of our company policies that if you are trying to use that image you have to have those rights,” Cullinan said. “We know certain advertisers use provocative things to try to drive interest. In terms of images of famous people, you have to have those rights.”

Regardless of the fact the advertisement uses actors and not actual images of the politicians and celebrity, Cullinan said, a reasonable person driving past the billboard would not be able to discern the difference.

“Politcal satire, that has been around forever," Cullinan said. "(It) doesn't work on a static billboard."

Cullinan said that is the same reason similar billboards in Los Angeles were censored.

“We are the biggest supporters of First Amendment rights,” Cullinan said.

Related Topics: Clear Channel, Clear Channel Outdoor, Gay Marriage, RNC, Republican National Convention, and banned billboard

Patch_comments_icon

Alex Tiegen

6:51 am on Thursday, August 2, 2012

Thanks for keeping us informed about the billboard issue.

Reply

Red Sam Rackham

1:24 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

Political Satire or Libel? That could be why it was censored.

Reply

mishi

1:36 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

Wikipedia "Clear Channel has been criticized for censoring opinions critical of George W. Bush and other Republicans. After Natalie Maines, the singer of the Dixie Chicks, told a London audience "we're ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas", the band's radio airplay dropped precipitously. Afterwards, some Clear Channel stations removed The Dixie Chicks from their playlists without any noted repercussions from the company. Gail Austin, Clear Channel's director of programming said, 'Out of respect for our troops, our city and our listeners, [we] have taken the Dixie Chicks off our playlists.' ....Clear Channel-owned KTVX was the only local television station that refused to air the paid political message of Cindy Sheehan against the war in Iraq"

Reply

Richard

1:38 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

It looks like censorship to me, because the images were of actors, who presumably consented and even were paid for the use of their images-- and not Romney, Trump, and Obama.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Red Sam Rackham

2:05 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

True. However if the actors were look-alikes of Romney, Trump and Obama then the people seing the photo would see those 3 famous people and a libel suit could happen unless a large easily readable disclaimer was on that billboard.

Comment_arrow

Eric Jeffrey

4:20 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

I suggest that you consult an IP lawyer, because the law is pretty clear that famous people do have an action for illegal use of their likeness if people are likely under the circumstances to think that it is the real person. When you are talking about a billboard, any reasonable likeness is likely to be an issue.

MaryAnne RMaryAnne

1:51 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

Facebook UrgentDogsofMiami, PetsonDeathRow, UrgentDeathRowDogs, UrgentOhioDogs, SavePinalAnimals, FriendsofArizonaShelterAnimals, PAAStx, sapetsalive, IrvingAnimalShelter, Urgent.Wise.Co.Animals, CollinCountyAnimalsinDanger, WacoUrgents, Urgentbcas, UrgentAnimalsinKilleen, TNDeathRowDogs, florencelauderdaleshelter, colbertcountyshelter, HCASVolunteers, FOSCGA, GastonACNCavailablePets, AACanimalcontrol, centralcaliforniapetsalive, HarborAnimalShelter, ocshelterdogs, UrgentDogsAtBranchCountyAcQuincyMi, LawrenceCountyDogShelter, UrgentCats of Miami, NYCUrgentCats, AlaskanShelterDogs, helpmexicandogs, friends.of.mannford.shelter or TakeAction.BanAnimalGasChambers. PetHarbor and The Humane Society also have pictures of some shelter animals online.

Reply

robert shatzkin

2:29 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

you mean it's not a problem with clear channel a bain company with strong associations with mitt romney??why do i find that hard to believe

Reply

Goldie Locks

2:34 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

So sad. Clear Channel needs a new head of advertising ..one who might be tolerent to all of of us just not those of an alternate liberal lifestyle.

Reply

robert shatzkin

2:44 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

limbaugh (a clearchannel employee) was in the backround crrying like a baby

Reply

Sandy

6:10 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

So, if this would have been a picture of Obama & Harry Reid as the "newlyweds" and Pelosi as the the preacher, would y'all still be okay with this "billboard"?

Reply

rick barasso

6:21 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

What's that old saying? "There's no such thing as bad publicity". Chick-fil-a anyone?

Reply

Leave a comment